telegraph.co.uk

Report from 7/24/2026, 11:09:49 AM https://telegraph.co.uk
Latest run · lab, cold cache
47
7/24/2026
28-day score · p75 · the standard
45
14 runs
CRR99%latest
SSD50%latest
TC190 toklatest
TTFUT257 ms28-day p75

Scored by v3 · source-of-truth hashes: score db860d6ac94e · thresholds e94f8b33e500 — verifiable against the canonical scorer.

The 28-day score is the p75 of nightly runs — the stable number to cite. Deterministic metrics (CRR/SSD/TC) show their latest value (they move only when the site changes); timing (TTFUT) and answer-fidelity (AF) are smoothed by 28-day p75 — the same lab-vs-field split Core Web Vitals uses. Synthetic daily measurement, not real-user field data.

Core Agent Vitals badge  Embed this badge

Show your agent-readiness score anywhere — it links back to this report.

[![Core Agent Vitals](https://agentvitals.dev/badge/telegraph.co.uk.svg)](https://agentvitals.dev/results?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftelegraph.co.uk)
<a href="https://agentvitals.dev/results?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftelegraph.co.uk"><img src="https://agentvitals.dev/badge/telegraph.co.uk.svg" alt="Core Agent Vitals" height="20"></a>
What AI tells your customers about youAgent confidence: LOW
Business namenot found
Categorynot found
Pricenot applicable · not applicable to this page type
Locationnot applicable · not applicable to this page type
Hoursnot applicable · not applicable to this page type
Productsnot applicable · not applicable to this page type
Descriptionnot found

An agent is likely to fabricate missing details rather than say “I don’t know”. 0/3 applicable facts come from machine-readable structured data.

We recovered only a shell of this page (under 200 tokens) — likely a soft bot-block or a client-rendered app that served our scanner almost no content. The metrics below reflect that shell, not your real site; the score is capped until an agent can retrieve real content.
47
Overall score
weighted CAV (0–100)
WARN
0–4950–8990–100

Metrics

99%
CRR Content Recovery Good
0.50
SSD Semantic Signal Density Needs work
190 tok
TC Token Cost Good
242 ms
TTFUT Time to First Useful Token N/A

Token Cost breakdown

Where the page's tokens go (≈218 across regions). Most tokens are real content — the agent isn't paying much for chrome.

Content
100% · 218
Chrome (nav / header / footer)
0% · 0
Boilerplate (cookie / ad)
0% · 0
Other
0% · 0

Final screenshot

Final screenshot of https://telegraph.co.uk

Diagnostics

medium SSD Low signal-to-noise for agents

content vs chrome/boilerplate

Evidencesignal 1.00 (full) · JSON-LD 0/1 · missing: structured-data
ImpactAgent spends tokens parsing nav/boilerplate instead of content.
Effort30–90 min

Fix: Wrap the real content in <main>/<article>, cut repeated nav/boilerplate, and keep the primary content dense and early in the DOM.

Rendered profile: headless

Agent Discoverability 77/100 · Needs Work

Access & discovery checks — separate from the gated CAV metrics above. Click an issue for business impact, what we measured, and how to fix. · Take the Agent Readiness course →

Agent files & endpoints

llms.txt Absent at /llms.txt and /.well-known/llms.txt Learn →
robots.txt (AI bots) Blocks: * (all) Learn →
sitemap.xml Found at /sitemap.xml Learn →
JSON-LD structured data Types: WebSite Learn →
~ agents.json Absent (emerging standard) Learn →
~ WebMCP endpoint Absent (emerging standard) Learn →
~ OpenAPI / API docs No OpenAPI/Swagger found Learn →

Issues (5)

robots.txt allows AI bots high impact Blocks: * (all)

Business impact If robots.txt blocks AI crawlers you are invisible to ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity — they skip you and recommend a competitor instead.

What we measured We read /robots.txt and test it against 16 AI user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, …) for a Disallow that blocks them.

How to fix Allow major AI bots to public content; restrict only private paths (/admin, /api).

Learn how to implement →

User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /
Disallow: /admin/

Spec: https://platform.openai.com/docs/gptbot

llms.txt present high impact Absent at /llms.txt and /.well-known/llms.txt

Business impact llms.txt is the robots.txt for AI: it tells agents what your site is, what matters, and where to find it. Without it AI guesses — and guessing means inaccurate recommendations and lost visibility.

What we measured We fetch /llms.txt and /.well-known/llms.txt and validate the spec (H1 title + a one-line blockquote summary). We also note /llms-full.txt (your full content as Markdown).

How to fix Create /llms.txt with a short summary + key pages; optionally /llms-full.txt with full content in Markdown.

Learn how to implement →

# Your Site
> One-line description for AI agents.

## Key pages
- /products — catalog
- /pricing — plans
- /docs — documentation

Spec: https://llmstxt.org

~ agents.json discovery low impact Absent (emerging standard)

Business impact agents.json describes what your site can DO for agents (services, endpoints, capabilities) — an emerging discovery standard. Early adopters get native agent integration.

What we measured We check /agents.json and /.well-known/agents.json for a valid configuration.

How to fix Publish /agents.json describing your site's capabilities and actions.

Learn how to implement →

Spec: https://github.com/wild-card-ai/agents-json

~ WebMCP endpoint low impact Absent (emerging standard)

Business impact WebMCP lets agents call actions on your site directly (book, buy, query) instead of scraping the DOM. Early adopters get native AI-agent interoperability.

What we measured We check /.well-known/webmcp and /webmcp.json for a valid actions array.

How to fix Add a WebMCP endpoint exposing your key actions to agents.

Learn how to implement →

Spec: https://webmcp.org

~ API documentation low impact No OpenAPI/Swagger found

Business impact Programmatic agents prefer a typed API. An OpenAPI/Swagger spec lets them integrate without scraping.

What we measured We probe /openapi.json, /swagger.json, /api-docs and /.well-known/openapi.json.

How to fix Publish an OpenAPI spec at a well-known path.

Learn how to implement →

Spec: https://www.openapis.org/

Passed audits (7)

✓ No CAPTCHA wall✓ No content-blocking cookie wall✓ Machine-readable prices✓ No login wall on public content✓ Structured data (JSON-LD)✓ XML sitemap present + fresh✓ Server response (TTFB)

Transport & Trust (SEC 1.0.0)

HTTPS, HSTS, CSP, sniffing, referrer and CORS posture. Diagnostic only — this does not affect the CAV score. A security header does not make a page more legible to an agent, so scoring it would reward a CDN toggle that changes nothing an agent can recover. We measure it and say so.

37Transport posture (0–100, unscored)
1pass
1warn
3fail
Per-header findings (6)
HeaderEvidence
✅ HTTPSserved over HTTPS
❌ HSTSno strict-transport-security header
❌ Content-Security-Policyno content-security-policy header
❌ X-Content-Type-Optionsmissing nosniff
⚠️ Referrer-Policyno referrer-policy header (browser default applies)
➖ CORS exposureno CORS headers on the document (normal for an HTML page)
Full profile — how to improve · unused JS · network · timing

How to improve

highProfile reflects a block/challenge page — not your contenthighest leverage

whole profile

EvidenceMeasured against a block/challenge page (the main document returned HTTP 402); every number here describes the wall, not your site.
ImpactAn AI agent hits the same wall and recovers none of your content — fix the block before optimizing anything else.
FixAllowlist legitimate agent user-agents / IP ranges in your WAF or bot-management and serve real content (not a challenge), then re-run.

JavaScript coverage

0 KiB unused of 0 KiB (0% unused JS) — unused JS inflates Token Cost (TC) and slows the agent's parse.

No script coverage captured.

Network

2Requests
4 KiBTransferred
0Scripts
0%3rd-party
0Long tasks
Other (1)
3 KiB
Document (1)
1 KiB
Heaviest requests (2)
URLTypeStatusTransfer
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/etc.clientlibs/settings/wcm/designs/telegraph/core/clientlibs/core/resources/icons/favicon.icoOther2003 KiB
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/Document4021 KiB
Analyzing…
running mobile + desktop · ~30s