www.usbank.com

Report from 7/21/2026, 10:10:48 AM https://www.usbank.com
Latest run · lab, cold cache
59
7/21/2026
28-day score · p75 · the standard
4/7 runs — building history (nightly)

Scored by v3 · source-of-truth hashes: score db860d6ac94e · thresholds e94f8b33e500 — verifiable against the canonical scorer.

The 28-day score is the p75 of nightly runs — the stable number to cite. Deterministic metrics (CRR/SSD/TC) show their latest value (they move only when the site changes); timing (TTFUT) and answer-fidelity (AF) are smoothed by 28-day p75 — the same lab-vs-field split Core Web Vitals uses. Synthetic daily measurement, not real-user field data.

Core Agent Vitals badge  Embed this badge

Show your agent-readiness score anywhere — it links back to this report.

[![Core Agent Vitals](https://agentvitals.dev/badge/usbank.com.svg)](https://agentvitals.dev/results?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.usbank.com)
<a href="https://agentvitals.dev/results?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.usbank.com"><img src="https://agentvitals.dev/badge/usbank.com.svg" alt="Core Agent Vitals" height="20"></a>
What AI tells your customers about youAgent confidence: LOW
🟡Business namePersonal Banking, Credit Cards, Loans & Investing | U.S. Bank · guessed from page text (no structured data)
Categorynot found
🟡Price$1,00 · guessed from page text (no structured data)
Locationnot applicable · not applicable to this page type
Hoursnot applicable · not applicable to this page type
Productsnot applicable · not applicable to this page type
🟡DescriptionExperience personalized banking services for your unique needs with U.S. Bank - Checking, credit cards, home loans & convenient online banking. Member FDIC. · guessed from page text (no structured data)

An agent is likely to fabricate missing details rather than say “I don’t know”. 0/4 applicable facts come from machine-readable structured data.

59
Overall score
weighted CAV (0–100)
FAIL
0–4950–8990–100

Metrics

100%
CRR Content Recovery Good
0.17
SSD Semantic Signal Density Poor
441 tok
TC Token Cost Good
103 ms
TTFUT Time to First Useful Token N/A

Token Cost breakdown

Where the page's tokens go (≈4,995 across regions). 66% is non-content — chrome and boilerplate an agent pays for. Add landmark roles (main/nav/header/footer) so agents can skip it.

Content
34.4% · 1,718
Chrome (nav / header / footer)
62.1% · 3,103
Boilerplate (cookie / ad)
0% · 0
Other
3.5% · 174

Final screenshot

Final screenshot of https://www.usbank.com

Diagnostics

high SSD Low signal-to-noise for agents

content vs chrome/boilerplate

Evidencesignal 0.30 · JSON-LD 0/1 · missing: structured-data
ImpactAgent spends tokens parsing nav/boilerplate instead of content.
Effort30–90 min

Fix: Wrap the real content in <main>/<article>, cut repeated nav/boilerplate, and keep the primary content dense and early in the DOM.

high TC 65.6% of tokens are non-content (boilerplate/chrome)

agent representation — token decomposition

EvidenceToken decomposition: content 34.4%, chrome 62.1%, boilerplate 0%, other 3.5%. Only 34.400000000000006% of the agent's tokens are real content.
ImpactAn agent pays for boilerplate on every request and has less context left for the real content.
Effort30–90 min

Fix: Strip repeated nav/header/footer/cookie chrome from the agent-visible output; wrap content in <main>/<article> so the extractor keeps signal and drops boilerplate.

Rendered profile: headless

Agent Discoverability 72/100 · Needs Work

Access & discovery checks — separate from the gated CAV metrics above. Click an issue for business impact, what we measured, and how to fix. · Take the Agent Readiness course →

Agent files & endpoints

llms.txt Absent at /llms.txt and /.well-known/llms.txt Learn →
robots.txt (AI bots) Major AI bots allowed Learn →
sitemap.xml Found at /sitemap.xml Learn →
JSON-LD structured data No JSON-LD found Learn →
~ agents.json Absent (emerging standard) Learn →
~ WebMCP endpoint Absent (emerging standard) Learn →
~ OpenAPI / API docs No OpenAPI/Swagger found Learn →

Issues (6)

~ No content-blocking cookie wall medium impact Consent platform: onetrust (verify it doesn't block content)

Business impact A consent wall that hides content until a click is invisible to agents — they cannot click 'Accept'.

What we measured We fingerprint OneTrust, Cookiebot, Usercentrics and similar managers and flag content-blocking ones.

How to fix Use an overlay banner that leaves content in the DOM, not a blocking interstitial.

Spec: https://gdpr.eu/cookies/

llms.txt present high impact Absent at /llms.txt and /.well-known/llms.txt

Business impact llms.txt is the robots.txt for AI: it tells agents what your site is, what matters, and where to find it. Without it AI guesses — and guessing means inaccurate recommendations and lost visibility.

What we measured We fetch /llms.txt and /.well-known/llms.txt and validate the spec (H1 title + a one-line blockquote summary). We also note /llms-full.txt (your full content as Markdown).

How to fix Create /llms.txt with a short summary + key pages; optionally /llms-full.txt with full content in Markdown.

Learn how to implement →

# Your Site
> One-line description for AI agents.

## Key pages
- /products — catalog
- /pricing — plans
- /docs — documentation

Spec: https://llmstxt.org

Structured data (JSON-LD) medium impact No JSON-LD found

Business impact Schema.org JSON-LD tells agents what a page IS (product, article, business) with typed fields (price, rating, hours). Without it agents extract less reliably.

What we measured We parse <script type=application/ld+json>, validate it, and check for populated @type fields.

How to fix Add JSON-LD: Organization/LocalBusiness on the homepage, Product on product pages, Article on posts.

Learn how to implement →

<script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Organization","name":"Your Co","url":"https://example.com"}</script>

Spec: https://schema.org/

~ agents.json discovery low impact Absent (emerging standard)

Business impact agents.json describes what your site can DO for agents (services, endpoints, capabilities) — an emerging discovery standard. Early adopters get native agent integration.

What we measured We check /agents.json and /.well-known/agents.json for a valid configuration.

How to fix Publish /agents.json describing your site's capabilities and actions.

Learn how to implement →

Spec: https://github.com/wild-card-ai/agents-json

~ WebMCP endpoint low impact Absent (emerging standard)

Business impact WebMCP lets agents call actions on your site directly (book, buy, query) instead of scraping the DOM. Early adopters get native AI-agent interoperability.

What we measured We check /.well-known/webmcp and /webmcp.json for a valid actions array.

How to fix Add a WebMCP endpoint exposing your key actions to agents.

Learn how to implement →

Spec: https://webmcp.org

~ API documentation low impact No OpenAPI/Swagger found

Business impact Programmatic agents prefer a typed API. An OpenAPI/Swagger spec lets them integrate without scraping.

What we measured We probe /openapi.json, /swagger.json, /api-docs and /.well-known/openapi.json.

How to fix Publish an OpenAPI spec at a well-known path.

Learn how to implement →

Spec: https://www.openapis.org/

Passed audits (6)

✓ robots.txt allows AI bots✓ No CAPTCHA wall✓ Machine-readable prices✓ No login wall on public content✓ XML sitemap present + fresh✓ Server response (TTFB)

Transport & Trust (SEC 1.0.0)

HTTPS, HSTS, CSP, sniffing, referrer and CORS posture. Diagnostic only — this does not affect the CAV score. A security header does not make a page more legible to an agent, so scoring it would reward a CDN toggle that changes nothing an agent can recover. We measure it and say so.

80Transport posture (0–100, unscored)
5pass
0warn
1fail
Per-header findings (6)
HeaderEvidence
✅ HTTPSserved over HTTPS
❌ HSTSno strict-transport-security header
✅ Content-Security-Policypolicy present, script-src does not allow inline
✅ X-Content-Type-Optionsnosniff
✅ Referrer-Policyno-referrer-when-downgrade
✅ CORS exposureaccess-control-allow-origin: *
Full profile — how to improve · unused JS · network · timing

A deeper scan (a second render, ~30–60s): network waterfall, unused JavaScript, long tasks, and prioritized fixes. Runs only when you ask; the result is cached so it never re-runs.

Analyzing…
running mobile + desktop · ~30s