www.alibaba.com

Report from 8/10/2026, 10:56:19 AM https://www.alibaba.com
Latest run · lab, cold cache
42
8/10/2026
28-day score · p75 · the standard
42
29 runs
CRR13%latest
SSD26%latest
TC239 toklatest
TTFUT123 ms28-day p75

Scored by v3 · source-of-truth hashes: score db860d6ac94e · thresholds e94f8b33e500 — verifiable against the canonical scorer.

The 28-day score is the p75 of nightly runs — the stable number to cite. Deterministic metrics (CRR/SSD/TC) show their latest value (they move only when the site changes); timing (TTFUT) and answer-fidelity (AF) are smoothed by 28-day p75 — the same lab-vs-field split Core Web Vitals uses. Synthetic daily measurement, not real-user field data.

Core Agent Vitals badge  Embed this badge

Show your agent-readiness score anywhere — it links back to this report.

[![Core Agent Vitals](https://agentvitals.dev/badge/alibaba.com.svg)](https://agentvitals.dev/results?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.alibaba.com)
<a href="https://agentvitals.dev/results?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.alibaba.com"><img src="https://agentvitals.dev/badge/alibaba.com.svg" alt="Core Agent Vitals" height="20"></a>
What AI tells your customers about youAgent confidence: LOW
🟡Business nameAlibaba · guessed from page text (no structured data)
CategoryWebSite
Pricenot applicable · not applicable to this page type
Locationnot applicable · not applicable to this page type
Hoursnot applicable · not applicable to this page type
Productsnot applicable · not applicable to this page type
🟡DescriptionFind quality Manufacturers, Suppliers, Exporters, Importers, Buyers, Wholesalers, Products and Trade Leads from our award-winning International Trade Site. Import & Export on alibaba.com · guessed from page text (no structured data)

An agent is likely to fabricate missing details rather than say “I don’t know”. 1/3 applicable facts come from machine-readable structured data.

42
Overall score
weighted CAV (0–100)
FAIL
0–4950–8990–100

Metrics

13%
CRR Content Recovery Poor
0.26
SSD Semantic Signal Density Poor
239 tok
TC Token Cost Good
102 ms
TTFUT Time to First Useful Token N/A

Token Cost breakdown

Where the page's tokens go (≈70,959 across regions). 98% is non-content — chrome and boilerplate an agent pays for. Add landmark roles (main/nav/header/footer) so agents can skip it.

Content
2.4% · 1,678
Chrome (nav / header / footer)
11.7% · 8,305
Boilerplate (cookie / ad)
0% · 0
Other
85.9% · 60,976

Final screenshot

Final screenshot of https://www.alibaba.com

Diagnostics

high CRR Content is hidden behind JavaScript

pre-JS raw HTML

Evidence87% of content requires JS · 13% of rendered content recovered (rest is placeholder/wrong)
ImpactA non-rendering agent never sees the JS-injected content.
Effort1–4 h

Fix: Server-render or statically generate the main content so a non-JS agent still receives it; make client rendering a progressive enhancement, not the source of truth.

high SSD Low signal-to-noise for agents

content vs chrome/boilerplate

Evidencesignal 0.02 · website JSON-LD 1/2 · missing: name
ImpactAgent spends tokens parsing nav/boilerplate instead of content.
Effort30–90 min

Fix: Wrap the real content in <main>/<article>, cut repeated nav/boilerplate, and keep the primary content dense and early in the DOM.

high TC 97.6% of tokens are non-content (boilerplate/chrome)

agent representation — token decomposition

EvidenceToken decomposition: content 2.4%, chrome 11.7%, boilerplate 0%, other 85.9%. Only 2.4000000000000057% of the agent's tokens are real content.
ImpactAn agent pays for boilerplate on every request and has less context left for the real content.
Effort30–90 min

Fix: Strip repeated nav/header/footer/cookie chrome from the agent-visible output; wrap content in <main>/<article> so the extractor keeps signal and drops boilerplate.

Rendered profile: headless

Agent Discoverability 72/100 · Needs Work

Access & discovery checks — separate from the gated CAV metrics above. Click an issue for business impact, what we measured, and how to fix. · Take the Agent Readiness course →

Agent files & endpoints

~ llms.txt Found at /llms.txt but missing H1/blockquote Learn →
robots.txt (AI bots) Blocks: * (all) Learn →
~ sitemap.xml Sitemap found but no <url>/<loc> entries Learn →
JSON-LD structured data Types: WebSite Learn →
agents.json Found at /agents.json Learn →
WebMCP endpoint Found at /.well-known/webmcp Learn →
OpenAPI / API docs Found at /openapi.json Learn →

Issues (4)

robots.txt allows AI bots high impact Blocks: * (all)

Business impact If robots.txt blocks AI crawlers you are invisible to ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity — they skip you and recommend a competitor instead.

What we measured We read /robots.txt and test it against 16 AI user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, …) for a Disallow that blocks them.

How to fix Allow major AI bots to public content; restrict only private paths (/admin, /api).

Learn how to implement →

User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /
Disallow: /admin/

Spec: https://platform.openai.com/docs/gptbot

~ llms.txt present + valid high impact Found at /llms.txt but missing H1/blockquote

Business impact llms.txt is the robots.txt for AI: it tells agents what your site is, what matters, and where to find it. Without it AI guesses — and guessing means inaccurate recommendations and lost visibility.

What we measured We fetch /llms.txt and /.well-known/llms.txt and validate the spec (H1 title + a one-line blockquote summary). We also note /llms-full.txt (your full content as Markdown).

How to fix Create /llms.txt with a short summary + key pages; optionally /llms-full.txt with full content in Markdown.

Learn how to implement →

# Your Site
> One-line description for AI agents.

## Key pages
- /products — catalog
- /pricing — plans
- /docs — documentation

Spec: https://llmstxt.org

~ No login wall on public content high impact Login signal: please sign in

Business impact Public content behind authentication is unreachable to agents (they have no account). Gate only genuinely private material.

What we measured We follow redirects and detect 401/403 and login-form signals on content pages.

How to fix Separate public marketing/docs from authenticated areas; keep public pages reachable without login.

Spec: https://llmstxt.org

~ XML sitemap present medium impact Sitemap found but no <url>/<loc> entries

Business impact A sitemap is your table of contents for AI crawlers. Without it agents follow homepage links and miss deep pages (products, docs, pricing) — shrinking what they can recommend.

What we measured We fetch /sitemap.xml (and /sitemap_index.xml), confirm valid XML with <loc> entries, and check <lastmod> freshness.

How to fix Generate an XML sitemap of all public pages with current lastmod dates and reference it in robots.txt.

Learn how to implement →

# robots.txt
Sitemap: https://example.com/sitemap.xml

Spec: https://www.sitemaps.org/

Passed audits (8)

✓ No CAPTCHA wall✓ No content-blocking cookie wall✓ Machine-readable prices✓ Structured data (JSON-LD)✓ Server response (TTFB)✓ agents.json discovery✓ WebMCP endpoint✓ API documentation

Transport & Trust (SEC 1.0.0)

HTTPS, HSTS, CSP, sniffing, referrer and CORS posture. Diagnostic only — this does not affect the CAV score. A security header does not make a page more legible to an agent, so scoring it would reward a CDN toggle that changes nothing an agent can recover. We measure it and say so.

70Transport posture (0–100, unscored)
3pass
1warn
1fail
Per-header findings (6)
HeaderEvidence
✅ HTTPSserved over HTTPS
✅ HSTSmax-age=31536000
❌ Content-Security-Policyno content-security-policy header
✅ X-Content-Type-Optionsnosniff
⚠️ Referrer-Policyno referrer-policy header (browser default applies)
➖ CORS exposureno CORS headers on the document (normal for an HTML page)
Full profile — how to improve · unused JS · network · timing

A deeper scan (a second render, ~30–60s): network waterfall, unused JavaScript, long tasks, and prioritized fixes. Runs only when you ask; the result is cached so it never re-runs.

Analyzing…
running mobile + desktop · ~30s