www.engadget.com

Report from 9/20/2026, 11:57:48 AM https://www.engadget.com
Latest run · lab, cold cache
49
9/20/2026
28-day score · p75 · the standard
49
29 runs
CRR37%latest
SSD97%latest
TC4287 toklatest
TTFUT41 ms28-day p75

Scored by v3 · source-of-truth hashes: score db860d6ac94e · thresholds e94f8b33e500 — verifiable against the canonical scorer.

The 28-day score is the p75 of nightly runs — the stable number to cite. Deterministic metrics (CRR/SSD/TC) show their latest value (they move only when the site changes); timing (TTFUT) and answer-fidelity (AF) are smoothed by 28-day p75 — the same lab-vs-field split Core Web Vitals uses. Synthetic daily measurement, not real-user field data.

Core Agent Vitals badge  Embed this badge

Show your agent-readiness score anywhere — it links back to this report.

[![Core Agent Vitals](https://agentvitals.dev/badge/engadget.com.svg)](https://agentvitals.dev/results?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.engadget.com)
<a href="https://agentvitals.dev/results?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.engadget.com"><img src="https://agentvitals.dev/badge/engadget.com.svg" alt="Core Agent Vitals" height="20"></a>
What AI tells your customers about youAgent confidence: MEDIUM
Business nameEngadget
CategoryOrganization
🟡Price$500,00 · guessed from page text (no structured data)
Location11787 Lantern Road #201, Fishers, IN, 46038, US
Hoursnot found
Productsnot found
DescriptionBreaking news from the worlds of technology and entertainment, and expert reviews of the latest consumer tech products.

An agent gets the basics but will guess on the gaps. 4/7 applicable facts come from machine-readable structured data.

This page served our agent materially different content than a browser. The score is capped because an agent can’t trust what it receives here.
49
Overall score
weighted CAV (0–100)
FAIL
0–4950–8990–100

Metrics

37%
CRR Content Recovery Poor
0.97
SSD Semantic Signal Density Good
4,287 tok
TC Token Cost Needs work
66 ms
TTFUT Time to First Useful Token N/A

Token Cost breakdown

Where the page's tokens go (≈22,305 across regions). Most tokens are real content — the agent isn't paying much for chrome.

Content
90.1% · 20,089
Chrome (nav / header / footer)
9.2% · 2,051
Boilerplate (cookie / ad)
0% · 0
Other
0.7% · 165

Final screenshot

Final screenshot of https://www.engadget.com

Diagnostics

high CRR Content is hidden behind JavaScript

pre-JS raw HTML

Evidence63% of content requires JS
ImpactA non-rendering agent never sees the JS-injected content.
Effort1–4 h

Fix: Server-render or statically generate the main content so a non-JS agent still receives it; make client rendering a progressive enhancement, not the source of truth.

medium TC Token cost over budget — 9.900000000000006% non-content

agent representation (Chrome/markdown output)

EvidenceToken decomposition: content 90.1%, chrome 9.2%, boilerplate 0%, other 0.7%. 4287 tokens total.
ImpactAn agent pays for every token; 9.900000000000006% is chrome/boilerplate/other and crowds the context window.
Effort30–90 min

Fix: Trim boilerplate, collapse repeated structures, and drop decorative markup from agent-visible content so an agent spends fewer tokens to read the page.

Rendered profile: headless

Agent Discoverability 94/100 · Agent Ready

Access & discovery checks — separate from the gated CAV metrics above. Click an issue for business impact, what we measured, and how to fix. · Take the Agent Readiness course →

Agent files & endpoints

~ llms.txt Found at /llms.txt but missing H1/blockquote Learn →
robots.txt (AI bots) Major AI bots allowed Learn →
sitemap.xml Found at /sitemap_index.xml Learn →
JSON-LD structured data Types: Organization Learn →
agents.json Found at /agents.json Learn →
WebMCP endpoint Found at /webmcp.json Learn →
OpenAPI / API docs Found at /openapi.json Learn →

Issues (1)

~ llms.txt present + valid high impact Found at /llms.txt but missing H1/blockquote

Business impact llms.txt is the robots.txt for AI: it tells agents what your site is, what matters, and where to find it. Without it AI guesses — and guessing means inaccurate recommendations and lost visibility.

What we measured We fetch /llms.txt and /.well-known/llms.txt and validate the spec (H1 title + a one-line blockquote summary). We also note /llms-full.txt (your full content as Markdown).

How to fix Create /llms.txt with a short summary + key pages; optionally /llms-full.txt with full content in Markdown.

Learn how to implement →

# Your Site
> One-line description for AI agents.

## Key pages
- /products — catalog
- /pricing — plans
- /docs — documentation

Spec: https://llmstxt.org

Passed audits (11)

✓ robots.txt allows AI bots✓ No CAPTCHA wall✓ No content-blocking cookie wall✓ Machine-readable prices✓ No login wall on public content✓ Structured data (JSON-LD)✓ XML sitemap present + fresh✓ Server response (TTFB)✓ agents.json discovery✓ WebMCP endpoint✓ API documentation

Transport & Trust (SEC 1.0.0)

HTTPS, HSTS, CSP, sniffing, referrer and CORS posture. Diagnostic only — this does not affect the CAV score. A security header does not make a page more legible to an agent, so scoring it would reward a CDN toggle that changes nothing an agent can recover. We measure it and say so.

37Transport posture (0–100, unscored)
1pass
1warn
3fail
Per-header findings (6)
HeaderEvidence
✅ HTTPSserved over HTTPS
❌ HSTSno strict-transport-security header
❌ Content-Security-Policyno content-security-policy header
❌ X-Content-Type-Optionsmissing nosniff
⚠️ Referrer-Policyno referrer-policy header (browser default applies)
➖ CORS exposureno CORS headers on the document (normal for an HTML page)
Full profile — how to improve · unused JS · network · timing

A deeper scan (a second render, ~30–60s): network waterfall, unused JavaScript, long tasks, and prioritized fixes. Runs only when you ask; the result is cached so it never re-runs.

Analyzing…
running mobile + desktop · ~30s