www.github.com

Report from 8/8/2026, 12:15:25 PM https://www.github.com/
Latest run · lab, cold cache
61
8/8/2026
28-day score · p75 · the standard
53
27 runs
CRR89%latest
SSD35%latest
TC724 toklatest
TTFUT314 ms28-day p75

Scored by v3 · source-of-truth hashes: score db860d6ac94e · thresholds e94f8b33e500 — verifiable against the canonical scorer.

The 28-day score is the p75 of nightly runs — the stable number to cite. Deterministic metrics (CRR/SSD/TC) show their latest value (they move only when the site changes); timing (TTFUT) and answer-fidelity (AF) are smoothed by 28-day p75 — the same lab-vs-field split Core Web Vitals uses. Synthetic daily measurement, not real-user field data.

Core Agent Vitals badge  Embed this badge

Show your agent-readiness score anywhere — it links back to this report.

[![Core Agent Vitals](https://agentvitals.dev/badge/github.com.svg)](https://agentvitals.dev/results?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.github.com%2F)
<a href="https://agentvitals.dev/results?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.github.com%2F"><img src="https://agentvitals.dev/badge/github.com.svg" alt="Core Agent Vitals" height="20"></a>
What AI tells your customers about youAgent confidence: LOW
🟡Business nameGitHub · guessed from page text (no structured data)
Categorynot found
🟡Price$16 · guessed from page text (no structured data)
Locationnot applicable · not applicable to this page type
Hoursnot applicable · not applicable to this page type
Productsnot applicable · not applicable to this page type
🟡DescriptionJoin the world's most widely adopted, AI-powered developer platform where millions of developers, businesses, and the largest open source community build software that advances humanity. · guessed from page text (no structured data)

⚠️ Your page title reads like a navigation menu, so an agent may cite your business as “GitHub · Change is constant. GitHub keeps you ahead. · GitHub”.

An agent is likely to fabricate missing details rather than say “I don’t know”. 0/4 applicable facts come from machine-readable structured data.

61
Overall score
weighted CAV (0–100)
FAIL
0–4950–8990–100

Metrics

89%
CRR Content Recovery Needs work
0.35
SSD Semantic Signal Density Poor
724 tok
TC Token Cost Good
137 ms
TTFUT Time to First Useful Token N/A

Token Cost breakdown

Where the page's tokens go (≈4,846 across regions). 41% is non-content — chrome and boilerplate an agent pays for. Add landmark roles (main/nav/header/footer) so agents can skip it.

Content
59% · 2,860
Chrome (nav / header / footer)
39.5% · 1,915
Boilerplate (cookie / ad)
0% · 0
Other
1.5% · 71

Final screenshot

Final screenshot of https://www.github.com/

Diagnostics

high SSD Low signal-to-noise for agents

content vs chrome/boilerplate

Evidencesignal 0.51 +llms.txt bonus · JSON-LD 0/1 · missing: structured-data
ImpactAgent spends tokens parsing nav/boilerplate instead of content.
Effort30–90 min

Fix: Wrap the real content in <main>/<article>, cut repeated nav/boilerplate, and keep the primary content dense and early in the DOM.

medium CRR Content is hidden behind JavaScript

pre-JS raw HTML

Evidence11% of content requires JS
ImpactA non-rendering agent never sees the JS-injected content.
Effort1–4 h

Fix: Server-render or statically generate the main content so a non-JS agent still receives it; make client rendering a progressive enhancement, not the source of truth.

medium TC 41% of tokens are non-content (boilerplate/chrome)

agent representation — token decomposition

EvidenceToken decomposition: content 59%, chrome 39.5%, boilerplate 0%, other 1.5%. Only 59% of the agent's tokens are real content.
ImpactAn agent pays for boilerplate on every request and has less context left for the real content.
Effort30–90 min

Fix: Strip repeated nav/header/footer/cookie chrome from the agent-visible output; wrap content in <main>/<article> so the extractor keeps signal and drops boilerplate.

Rendered profile: headless

Agent Discoverability 74/100 · Needs Work

Access & discovery checks — separate from the gated CAV metrics above. Click an issue for business impact, what we measured, and how to fix. · Take the Agent Readiness course →

Agent files & endpoints

llms.txt Found at /llms.txt Learn →
robots.txt (AI bots) Major AI bots allowed Learn →
sitemap.xml No /sitemap.xml Learn →
JSON-LD structured data No JSON-LD found Learn →
~ agents.json Absent (emerging standard) Learn →
~ WebMCP endpoint Absent (emerging standard) Learn →
OpenAPI / API docs Found at /api-docs Learn →

Issues (5)

~ No content-blocking cookie wall medium impact Consent platform: cookieconsent (verify it doesn't block content)

Business impact A consent wall that hides content until a click is invisible to agents — they cannot click 'Accept'.

What we measured We fingerprint OneTrust, Cookiebot, Usercentrics and similar managers and flag content-blocking ones.

How to fix Use an overlay banner that leaves content in the DOM, not a blocking interstitial.

Spec: https://gdpr.eu/cookies/

Structured data (JSON-LD) medium impact No JSON-LD found

Business impact Schema.org JSON-LD tells agents what a page IS (product, article, business) with typed fields (price, rating, hours). Without it agents extract less reliably.

What we measured We parse <script type=application/ld+json>, validate it, and check for populated @type fields.

How to fix Add JSON-LD: Organization/LocalBusiness on the homepage, Product on product pages, Article on posts.

Learn how to implement →

<script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Organization","name":"Your Co","url":"https://example.com"}</script>

Spec: https://schema.org/

XML sitemap present medium impact No /sitemap.xml

Business impact A sitemap is your table of contents for AI crawlers. Without it agents follow homepage links and miss deep pages (products, docs, pricing) — shrinking what they can recommend.

What we measured We fetch /sitemap.xml (and /sitemap_index.xml), confirm valid XML with <loc> entries, and check <lastmod> freshness.

How to fix Generate an XML sitemap of all public pages with current lastmod dates and reference it in robots.txt.

Learn how to implement →

# robots.txt
Sitemap: https://example.com/sitemap.xml

Spec: https://www.sitemaps.org/

~ agents.json discovery low impact Absent (emerging standard)

Business impact agents.json describes what your site can DO for agents (services, endpoints, capabilities) — an emerging discovery standard. Early adopters get native agent integration.

What we measured We check /agents.json and /.well-known/agents.json for a valid configuration.

How to fix Publish /agents.json describing your site's capabilities and actions.

Learn how to implement →

Spec: https://github.com/wild-card-ai/agents-json

~ WebMCP endpoint low impact Absent (emerging standard)

Business impact WebMCP lets agents call actions on your site directly (book, buy, query) instead of scraping the DOM. Early adopters get native AI-agent interoperability.

What we measured We check /.well-known/webmcp and /webmcp.json for a valid actions array.

How to fix Add a WebMCP endpoint exposing your key actions to agents.

Learn how to implement →

Spec: https://webmcp.org

Passed audits (7)

✓ robots.txt allows AI bots✓ No CAPTCHA wall✓ Machine-readable prices✓ llms.txt present + valid✓ No login wall on public content✓ Server response (TTFB)✓ API documentation

Transport & Trust (SEC 1.0.0)

HTTPS, HSTS, CSP, sniffing, referrer and CORS posture. Diagnostic only — this does not affect the CAV score. A security header does not make a page more legible to an agent, so scoring it would reward a CDN toggle that changes nothing an agent can recover. We measure it and say so.

100Transport posture (0–100, unscored)
5pass
0warn
0fail
Per-header findings (6)
HeaderEvidence
✅ HTTPSserved over HTTPS
✅ HSTSmax-age=31536000; includeSubdomains; preload
✅ Content-Security-Policypolicy present, script-src does not allow inline
✅ X-Content-Type-Optionsnosniff
✅ Referrer-Policyorigin-when-cross-origin, strict-origin-when-cross-origin
➖ CORS exposureno CORS headers on the document (normal for an HTML page)
Full profile — how to improve · unused JS · network · timing

A deeper scan (a second render, ~30–60s): network waterfall, unused JavaScript, long tasks, and prioritized fixes. Runs only when you ask; the result is cached so it never re-runs.

Analyzing…
running mobile + desktop · ~30s