www.interactivebrokers.com

Report from 8/10/2026, 12:30:38 PM https://www.interactivebrokers.com
Latest run · lab, cold cache
73
8/10/2026
28-day score · p75 · the standard
73
30 runs
CRR97%latest
SSD62%latest
TC465 toklatest
TTFUT659 ms28-day p75

Scored by v3 · source-of-truth hashes: score db860d6ac94e · thresholds e94f8b33e500 — verifiable against the canonical scorer.

The 28-day score is the p75 of nightly runs — the stable number to cite. Deterministic metrics (CRR/SSD/TC) show their latest value (they move only when the site changes); timing (TTFUT) and answer-fidelity (AF) are smoothed by 28-day p75 — the same lab-vs-field split Core Web Vitals uses. Synthetic daily measurement, not real-user field data.

Core Agent Vitals badge  Embed this badge

Show your agent-readiness score anywhere — it links back to this report.

[![Core Agent Vitals](https://agentvitals.dev/badge/interactivebrokers.com.svg)](https://agentvitals.dev/results?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.interactivebrokers.com)
<a href="https://agentvitals.dev/results?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.interactivebrokers.com"><img src="https://agentvitals.dev/badge/interactivebrokers.com.svg" alt="Core Agent Vitals" height="20"></a>
What AI tells your customers about youAgent confidence: MEDIUM
Business nameInteractive Brokers LLC
CategoryOrganization
🟡Price$0 · guessed from page text (no structured data)
Locationnot found
Hoursnot found
Productsnot found
DescriptionFinancial Services Company

⚠️ Your page title reads like a navigation menu, so an agent may cite your business as “Home | Interactive Brokers LLC”.

An agent gets the basics but will guess on the gaps. 3/7 applicable facts come from machine-readable structured data.

73
Overall score
weighted CAV (0–100)
PASS
0–4950–8990–100

Metrics

97%
CRR Content Recovery Good
0.62
SSD Semantic Signal Density Good
465 tok
TC Token Cost Good
289 ms
TTFUT Time to First Useful Token N/A

Token Cost breakdown

Where the page's tokens go (≈9,966 across regions). 83% is non-content — chrome and boilerplate an agent pays for. Add landmark roles (main/nav/header/footer) so agents can skip it.

Content
16.7% · 1,662
Chrome (nav / header / footer)
82.9% · 8,262
Boilerplate (cookie / ad)
0.4% · 42
Other
0% · 0

Final screenshot

Final screenshot of https://www.interactivebrokers.com

Diagnostics

high TC 83.3% of tokens are non-content (boilerplate/chrome)

agent representation — token decomposition

EvidenceToken decomposition: content 16.7%, chrome 82.9%, boilerplate 0.4%, other 0%. Only 16.700000000000003% of the agent's tokens are real content.
ImpactAn agent pays for boilerplate on every request and has less context left for the real content.
Effort30–90 min

Fix: Strip repeated nav/header/footer/cookie chrome from the agent-visible output; wrap content in <main>/<article> so the extractor keeps signal and drops boilerplate.

Rendered profile: headless

Agent Discoverability 89/100 · Agent Ready

Access & discovery checks — separate from the gated CAV metrics above. Click an issue for business impact, what we measured, and how to fix. · Take the Agent Readiness course →

Agent files & endpoints

~ llms.txt Found at /llms.txt but missing H1/blockquote Learn →
robots.txt (AI bots) Major AI bots allowed Learn →
~ sitemap.xml Stale (lastmod 2024-05-23) Learn →
JSON-LD structured data Types: Organization Learn →
~ agents.json Absent (emerging standard) Learn →
~ WebMCP endpoint Absent (emerging standard) Learn →
~ OpenAPI / API docs No OpenAPI/Swagger found Learn →

Issues (5)

~ llms.txt present + valid high impact Found at /llms.txt but missing H1/blockquote

Business impact llms.txt is the robots.txt for AI: it tells agents what your site is, what matters, and where to find it. Without it AI guesses — and guessing means inaccurate recommendations and lost visibility.

What we measured We fetch /llms.txt and /.well-known/llms.txt and validate the spec (H1 title + a one-line blockquote summary). We also note /llms-full.txt (your full content as Markdown).

How to fix Create /llms.txt with a short summary + key pages; optionally /llms-full.txt with full content in Markdown.

Learn how to implement →

# Your Site
> One-line description for AI agents.

## Key pages
- /products — catalog
- /pricing — plans
- /docs — documentation

Spec: https://llmstxt.org

~ XML sitemap fresh medium impact Stale (lastmod 2024-05-23)

Business impact A sitemap is your table of contents for AI crawlers. Without it agents follow homepage links and miss deep pages (products, docs, pricing) — shrinking what they can recommend.

What we measured We fetch /sitemap.xml (and /sitemap_index.xml), confirm valid XML with <loc> entries, and check <lastmod> freshness.

How to fix Generate an XML sitemap of all public pages with current lastmod dates and reference it in robots.txt.

Learn how to implement →

# robots.txt
Sitemap: https://example.com/sitemap.xml

Spec: https://www.sitemaps.org/

~ agents.json discovery low impact Absent (emerging standard)

Business impact agents.json describes what your site can DO for agents (services, endpoints, capabilities) — an emerging discovery standard. Early adopters get native agent integration.

What we measured We check /agents.json and /.well-known/agents.json for a valid configuration.

How to fix Publish /agents.json describing your site's capabilities and actions.

Learn how to implement →

Spec: https://github.com/wild-card-ai/agents-json

~ WebMCP endpoint low impact Absent (emerging standard)

Business impact WebMCP lets agents call actions on your site directly (book, buy, query) instead of scraping the DOM. Early adopters get native AI-agent interoperability.

What we measured We check /.well-known/webmcp and /webmcp.json for a valid actions array.

How to fix Add a WebMCP endpoint exposing your key actions to agents.

Learn how to implement →

Spec: https://webmcp.org

~ API documentation low impact No OpenAPI/Swagger found

Business impact Programmatic agents prefer a typed API. An OpenAPI/Swagger spec lets them integrate without scraping.

What we measured We probe /openapi.json, /swagger.json, /api-docs and /.well-known/openapi.json.

How to fix Publish an OpenAPI spec at a well-known path.

Learn how to implement →

Spec: https://www.openapis.org/

Passed audits (7)

✓ robots.txt allows AI bots✓ No CAPTCHA wall✓ No content-blocking cookie wall✓ Machine-readable prices✓ No login wall on public content✓ Structured data (JSON-LD)✓ Server response (TTFB)

Transport & Trust (SEC 1.0.0)

HTTPS, HSTS, CSP, sniffing, referrer and CORS posture. Diagnostic only — this does not affect the CAV score. A security header does not make a page more legible to an agent, so scoring it would reward a CDN toggle that changes nothing an agent can recover. We measure it and say so.

84Transport posture (0–100, unscored)
4pass
1warn
0fail
Per-header findings (6)
HeaderEvidence
✅ HTTPSserved over HTTPS
⚠️ HSTSmax-age=600 is below the 180-day baseline
✅ Content-Security-Policypolicy present, script-src does not allow inline
✅ X-Content-Type-Optionsnosniff
✅ Referrer-PolicyOrigin-when-cross-origin
➖ CORS exposureno CORS headers on the document (normal for an HTML page)
Full profile — how to improve · unused JS · network · timing

A deeper scan (a second render, ~30–60s): network waterfall, unused JavaScript, long tasks, and prioritized fixes. Runs only when you ask; the result is cached so it never re-runs.

Analyzing…
running mobile + desktop · ~30s